Measuring Reproduction Performance
4 min read
Herd reproductive performance is a crucial factor in your dairy farming success. This page highlights the importance of accurate record-keeping, right from a calf's birth, to get a true picture of your herd's reproductive health. There are specific measurements you can use to assess this, such as the '6-week in-calf rate' and the 'not-in-calf rate'. These indicators help you compare your performance to previous years and top farmers, respond to undesirable results, evaluate improvement strategies, and motivate your team towards better performance.
Getting an accurate picture of herd reproductive performance offers a starting point for improvements.
It is important that these measures are accurate and can be calculated consistently year after year. This isn’t easy without a good record system. Taking little steps can often make the biggest gains, so accuracy is important. Accurate records begin with the birth of every calf.
If you measure the reproductive performance of your herd with the best measures and at the best times, you will be able to:
There are a number of measures available to assess reproductive performance. Some give you an overall picture; others an insight to a particular component of reproductive performance.
The best overall measures describe the rate at which cows get pregnant once mating begins and the number of cows that remain empty at the end of mating.
The following two measures are used to determine where your herd is at:
The 6-week in-calf rate tells you the percentage of cows in your herd that became pregnant in the first 6 weeks of the mating period. These cows will calve early in the calving period next year. Where artificial breeding (AB) is used for the first 3-6 weeks of the mating period, many or all these cows will be pregnant to an AB sire.
Six weeks makes sense because it represents two oestrus cycles, and the halfway point through a 12-week mating period. At about week six the difference in how quickly cows are conceiving is most evident between herds.
The 6-week in-calf rate also captures both the drivers of in-calf rate – the 3-week submission rate and the conception rate.
Farmers from throughout New Zealand and Australia have told InCalf why they value high herd reproductive performance. You can expect the following benefits from improved reproduction.
|3-week submission rate||90%|
The not-in-calf rate tells you the percentage of the herd that failed to become pregnant during both the AB and bull mating periods.
Historically we used the ‘empty rate’ but an empty rate tends to only include the percentage of cows scanned and recorded as empty after pregnancy testing. It is not as helpful as it can differ from farm to farm depending on who was present at pregnancy testing time.
Once you know where your herd is at, it is often useful to understand a bit more about what is contributing to the result.
To get cows in calf quickly, they need to be inseminated early in the mating period and this is measured by the 3-week submission rate.
You also need to ensure that a reasonable proportion of inseminations result in pregnancy, as measured by the conception rate. To measure this, you have to be able to tell whether a cow conceived to insemination. There are two ways of doing this – directly through early-aged pregnancy testing or indirectly using non-return to heat.
Finally, a number of detailed measures are available to assess specific management areas. For example, 3-week submission rate of first calvers and pre-mating heats for the whole herd.
|Length of mating||Expected not-in-calf rate|
While the term empty rate is often used on farms to measure reproductive performance, it’s actually not easy to compare farm to farm and season to season. The ‘6-week in-calf rate’ gives us a solid indicator that allows you to compare performance with other farms, and season to season.
The percentage of cows who do not get in-calf during mating depends on a range of factors, but the final figure is heavily influenced by the ‘6-week in-calf rate’ and the length of mating. Without knowing the length of the mating period and the cows that weren’t pregnancy tested we don’t have the full picture.
When Joe proudly tells his neighbour Mary that his “empty rate” is 11 percent and she tells him hers is 16 percent, we may not be comparing apples with apples. Joe may have culled 20 cows before pregnancy testing and Mary may have mated her cows for two weeks less than him.
The not-in-calf rate is, essentially, everything minus the final in-calf rate - making it comparable for farms with similar mating lengths. This makes it ok to use for bench marking between years as well. An empty rate is not as helpful as it can differ from farm to farm depending on who was present at pregnancy testing time.
Each season we usually see an average of around 5 percent of eligible cows with no recorded outcome. They calved in the correct window and were present at the start of mating, but for whatever reason are not recorded as pregnant or not. These cows contribute to the overall reproductive performance and are included in the not-in-calf rate figure but not a recorded empty rate.
By using the ‘6-week in-calf rate,’ it’s easier for everyone to monitor reproductive performance and it can help you to be better able to drill down and identify how to improve this. By ditching the use of ‘empty rate’ and using a truly comparable measure we can fairly benchmark our performance from year to year and against other farms.